Search 101,000 Essays
|
Have us write a custom essay for you!
|
Wordcount: 823
|
On the Coherence of Agent-Neutrally Better States of Affairs
|
For the purposes of our present discussion we shall consider consequentialism to be the view that (1) if A is a right action, A is intended to increase goodness and (2) goodness is agent-neutral . Notice that in order for the first tenet of the view to be true, the phrase ‘increase goodness’ must be meaningful where goodness is constrained by agent-neutral values. In other words, it is essential to consequentialism that different states of affairs can be meaningfully compared by reference to an agent-neutral evaluative criterion
Foot attacks this central commitment of consequentialism by arguing that exist contexts in which the notion of agent-neutrally betters states of affairs is incoherent. In response, Hurka attempts to defen
|
This is only the first few lines of this paper. If you would like to view the entire paper you need to register here.
|
Get Instant Access to 100,000 Essays!!
|
|
|
|
